Abstract

Review Article

Current challenges in plant breeding to achieve zero hunger and overcome biotic and abiotic stresses induced by the global climate changes: A review

Gniech Karasawa Marines Marli*

Published: 28 July, 2021 | Volume 5 - Issue 2 | Pages: 053-057

According Sustainable Development goals until 2030 we should have zero hunger and undernourished people in the world. But to achieve this goal plant breeders must improve plants in order to produce at least the double than is produced now. This is not a easy pathway because we have only few years, but considering that plant breeding programs normally take several years to produce improved genotypes, also the further improved plants should face with pest, disease and other abiotic factors that are increasing with the current climate changes. In this review we will discuss the situation of hunger in the world and the remaining available land to increase food production, point out effects of biotic and abiotic factors on the food production and present some ways that can be used to fastening plant breeding.

Read Full Article HTML DOI: 10.29328/journal.jpsp.1001060 Cite this Article Read Full Article PDF

Keywords:

Pest; Disease; Abiotic factors; Sustainable development; Molecular breeding; Biotechnology techniques

References

  1. Bekeko Z, Mulualem T. Genetics of plant–pathogen interactions and resistance. J Gene Environ Resour Conservat. 2016; 4: 123-134.
  2. World food and agriculture statistical pocketbook 2020. Rome.2020. http://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/cb1521en/
  3. Tilman D. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc Nat Academy Sci. 2011; 108: 20260-20264.
  4. Ray DK, Mueller ND, West PC, Foley JA. Yield trends are insufficient to double global crop production by 2050. PloS One. 2013; 8: e66428. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23840465/
  5. United Nations, DESA, Population Division. World population prospects 2019, Volume II: Demografic profiles (ST/ESA/SER.A/427). 2019.
  6. Steinwand MA, Ronald PC. Crop biotechnology and the future of food. Nat Food. 2020; 1: 273-283.
  7. World food and agriculture statistical pocketbook 2019. Rome. 2019. http://www.fao.org/3/ca6463en/ca6463en.pdf
  8. Laborde D, Martin W, Swinnen J, Vos R. COVID-19 risks to global food security. Science. 2020; 369: 500-502. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32732407/
  9. Torero M. Without food, there can be no exit from the pandemic. Nature. 2020. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-01181-3?faodatalab=2020-04-23
  10. FAO-WFP. Hunger hotspots: FAO-WFP early warning on acute food insecurity (March to July outlook). 2020. https://www.wfp.org/publications/fao-wfp-early-warning-analysis-acute-food-insecurity-hotspots-november-2020
  11. Dormatey R, Sun C, Ali K, Coulter JA, Bi Z, et al. Gene pyramiding for sustainable Crop improvement against biotic and abiotic stresses. Agronomy. 2020; 10: 1255.
  12. Rodriguez M, Canales E, Borras-Hidalgo O. Molecular aspects of abiotic stress in plants. Biotecnologia Aplicada. 2005; 2: 1-10.
  13. De Storme N, Geelen D. high temperatures alter cross-over distribution and induce male meiotic restitution in Arabidopsis thaliana. Commun Biol. 2020; 3: 1-15. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32327690/
  14. Ray DK, Gerber JS, MacDonald GK, West PC. Climate variation explains a third of global crop yield variability. Nature Commun. 2015; 6: 5989.
  15. Mousavi S, Regni L, Bocchini M, Mariotti R, Cultrera NG, et al. Physiological, epigenetic and genetic regulation in some olive cultivars under salt stress. Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 1093.
  16. Zhao C, Zhang H, Song C, Zhu JK, Shabala S. Mechanisms of plant responses and adaptation to soil salinity. The innovation. 2020; 1: 100017.
  17. Faraji S, Filiz E, Kazemitabar SK, Vannozzi A, Palumbo F, et al. The AP2/ERF gene family in Triticum durum: genome-wide identification and expression analysis under drought and salinity stresses. Genes. 2020; 11: 1464.
  18. Chang YN, Zhu C, Jiang J, Zhang H, Zhu JK, et al. Epigenetic regulation in plant abiotic stress responses. J Integr Plant Biol. 2020; 62: 563-580. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31872527/
  19. Banerjee A, Roychoudhury A. Epigenetic regulation during salinity and drought stress in plants: Histone modifications and DNA methylation. Plant Gene. 2017; 11: 199-204.
  20. Lucas JA. Plant Pathology and Plant Pathogens. 4th Ed. John Willey & Sons. 2020; 432.
  21. Kim JH, Hilleary R, Seroka A, He SY. Crops of the future: building a climate-resilient plant immune system. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2021; 60: 101997. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33454653/
  22. Agrios GN. Plant Pathology. 5nd ed. San Diego: Elsevier. 2005.
  23. Hammond-Kosack KE, Jones JDG. Responses to plant-pathogens. In: Buchanan, B.B, Gruissen, W, Jones, R.L. Biochemistry and molecular biology of plants. 2nd ed. Oxford: Willey Blackwell. Chapter 21. 2015.
  24. Hulak N, González Plaza JJ. Plant-Pathogen Interactions: A Brief Insight into a Complicated Story. Agricul Conspectus Sci. 2015; 80: 217-222.
  25. Camargo LEA. Genética da interação patógeno-hospedeiro. In. Amorim, L, Rezende, J.A.M, Bergamin Filho, A. Manual de fitopatologia: princípios e conceitos. 5ª ed, Viçosa: Ceres, Cap. 156. 2018a.
  26. Pascholati SFP, Dalio RJD. Fisiologia do parasitismo: como os patógenos atacam as plantas. In. Amorim, L, Rezende, J.A.M, Bergamin Filho, A. Manual de fitopatologia. 5ª ed, Viçosa: Ceres, Cap. 34. 2018b.
  27. Camargo LEA. Contole genético. In. Amorim L, Rezende JAM, Bergamin Filho A. Manual de fitopatologia: princípios e conceitos. 5ª ed, Viçosa: Ceres, Cap. 15. 2018.
  28. Kaur B, Bhatia D, Mavi GS. Eighty years of gene-for-gene relationships and its application and utilization of R genes. J Gen. 2021; 100: 50. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34282731/
  29. Meisrimler CN, Allan C, Eccersall S, Morris RJ. Interior design: how plant pathogens optimize their living conditions. New Phytologist. 2021; 229: 2514-2524.
  30. Karasawa MMG, Pinto JEBP, Pinto JC, Pereira AV. Proliferação de capim elefante em diferentes concentrações de regulador de crescimento e consistências do meio de cultura. Ciência e Agrotecnologia. 2002; 26: 1243-1251.
  31. Karasawa MMG, Chiancone B, Gianguzzi V, Abdelgalel AM, Botta R, et al. Gametic embryogenesis through isolated microspore culture in Corylus avellana L. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC). 2021; 124: 635-647.
  32. Chiancone B, Karasawa MMG, Gianguzzi V, Abdelgalel AM, Bárány I, et al. Early embryo achievement through isolated microspore culture in Citrus clementina Hort. ex Tan, cvs.‘Monreal Rosso’and ‘Nules’. Frontiers in plant science. 2015; 6: 413.
  33. Gniech-Karasawa MM. Gametic embryogenesis, somatic embryogenesis, plant cell cultures, and protoplast fusion: Progress and Opportunities in Biofuel Production. Plant-Based Genetic Tools for Biofuels Production. 2017; 15.
  34. Gerald NDLF, Frei UK, Lübberstedt T. Accelerating plant breeding. Trends Plant Sci. 2013; 18: 667-672. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24080381/
  35. Bhardwaj A, Devi P, Chaudhary S, Rani A, Jha UC, Kumar S, et al. ‘Omics’ approaches in developing combined drought and heat tolerance in food crops. Plant Cell Rep. 2021; 1-41. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34223931/
  36. Biswas S, Zhang D, Shi J. CRISPR/Cas systems: opportunities and challenges for crop breeding. Plant Cell Rep. 2021; 40: 979-998.
  37. Qaim M. Role of new plant breeding technologies for food security and sustainable agricultural development. Appl Econo Perspect Policy. 2020; 42: 129-150.
  38. Liu S, Geng S, Li A, Mao Y, Mao L. RNAi technology for plant protection and its application in wheat. BIOTECH. 2021; 1-10.
  39. Dalakouras A, Wassenegger M, Dadami E, Ganopoulos I, Pappas ML, et al. Genetically modified organism-free RNA interference: exogenous application of RNA molecules in plants. Plant Physiol. 2020; 182: 38-50. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31285292/
  40. Sinha SK, Patil BL. Applications of RNA-Interference and Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) for Nutritional Genomics in Crop Plants. Phytonutritional Improvement of Crops. 2017; 185.
  41. Yadav AN, Kour D, Kaur T, Devi R, Guleria G, et al. Microbial biotechnology for sustainable agriculture: current research and future challenges. New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 2020; 331-344.
  42. Okungbowa FI, Shittu HO, Obiazikwor HO. Endophytic Bacteria: Hidden Protective Associates of Plants against Biotic and Abiotic Stresses. Notulae Scientia Biologicae. 2019; 11: 167-174.
  43. Lu J, Guan P, Gu J, Yang X, Wang F, et al. Exogenous DA-6 improves the low night temperature tolerance of tomato through regulating cytokinin. Front Plant Sci. 2021; 11: 599111. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33613581/
  44. Zhang J, Li S, Cai Q, Wang Z, Cao J, et al. Exogenous diethyl aminoethyl hexanoate ameliorates low temperature stress by improving nitrogen metabolism in maize seedlings. PloS One. 2020; 15: e0232294. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32353025/
  45. Zhang C, He P, Li Y, Li Y, Yao H, et al. Exogenous diethyl aminoethyl hexanoate, a plant growth regulator, highly improved the salinity tolerance of important medicinal plant Cassia obtusifolia L. J Plant Growth Regula. 2016; 35: 330-344.
  46. Naliwajski M, Skłodowska M. The relationship between the antioxidant system and proline metabolism in the leaves of cucumber plants acclimated to salt stress. Cells. 2021; 10: 609. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7998282/
  47. Ghaffari H, Tadayona MR, Bahadora M, Razmjoob J. Investigation of the proline role in controlling traits related to sugar and root yield of sugar beet under water deficit conditions. Agri Water Management. 2021; 243: 106448.
  48. United Nations DESA. Sustainable development goals. 2015; https://sdgs.un.org/goals
  49. Kilian B, Dempewolf H, Guarino L, Werner P, Coyne C, et al. Crop Science special issue: Adapting agriculture to climate change: A walk on the wild side. Crop Sci. 2021; 61: 32-36.
  50. Dwivedi SL, Scheben A, Edwards D, Spillane C, Ortiz R. Assessing and exploiting functional diversity in germplasm pools to enhance abiotic stress adaptation and yield in cereals and food legumes. Front Plant Sci. 2017; 8: 1461. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28900432/
  51. Jones H, Gosman N, Horsnell R, Rose GA, Everest LA, et al. Strategy for exploiting exotic germplasm using genetic, morphological, and environmental diversity: the Aegilops tauschii Coss. example. Theor Appl Gene. 2016; 126: 1793-1808. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23558983/
  52. Palanisamy D, Marappan S, Ponnuswamy RD, Mahalingam PS, Bohar R, et al. Accelerating hybrid rice breeding through the adoption of doubled haploid technology for R-line development. Biologia. 2019; 74: 1259-1269.
  53. Cobb JN, Juma RU, Biswas PS, Arbelaez JD, Rutkoski J, et al. Enhancing the rate of genetic gain in public-sector plant breeding programs: lessons from the breeder’s equation. Theo Appl Gene. 2019; 132: 627-645

Figures:

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 2

Similar Articles

Recently Viewed

Read More

Most Viewed

Read More