Review Article

Three modern serological methods to detect plant viruses

Mahmoud Hamdy Abd El-Aziz*

Published: 10 October, 2019 | Volume 3 - Issue 3 | Pages: 101-106

The use of enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of plant viruses is well documented. It proved to be a very valuable detection tools for the plant viruses. The efficiency of the ELISA technique was for practical purpose independent of the ratio of antibodies to antigen. This avoids the necessity of making specific enzyme conjugates for each antigen to be tested and eliminates the extreme specificity, thus allowing for quantitative evaluation of strain relationships. The advantages of indirect ELISA are sample. It needs only to be macerated and added to the plate. The crude antiserum could be used, although it should be cross absorbed before to prevent spurious host reaction. Single commercially available second antibody conjugate is utilized, thus eliminating the problems of preparing and storing many different conjugated antisera. Blotting technique has become widely used for specific identification of nucleic acid and proteins. This dot assay was modified to detect protein by spotting the antigen on a nitrocellulose membrane and incubating the membrane in test antibody followed by incubation in peroxidase-conjugated second antibody to the first antibody, and by development in 4-chloro-1-naphthol. The above procedure termed dot blot immunobinding assay (DBIA). The technique of tissue blotting on nitrocellulose membrane was described for detection of plant viruses in infected plants. Tissue blots were made by pressing with a firm and gentile force, the freshly cut tissue surface on nitrocellulose membranes. The possibility of using both sides of the nitrocellulose membrane (NCM) by tissue blot immuno assay (TBIA) for the detection plant viruses. In an effort to reduce the cost of virus assays, different types of regular paper were evaluated as possible replacements for the commonly used nitrocellulose membrane (NCM) as the solid phase in the tissue-blot immunoassay (TBIA) were used. Comparisons between different serological methods were demonstrated by many investigators Dot immunobinding was eight times more sensitive for detection of PVX and four times more sensitive for detection of PVS and PVY than DAS-ELISA.

Read Full Article HTML DOI: 10.29328/journal.jpsp.1001039 Cite this Article Read Full Article PDF


ELISA; TBIA; DBIA; Antibodies; NCM


  1. Abd El-Aziz MH. Hamza KA, Younes HA. Serological and Molecular Studies on potato virus Y. 2019; 85. NOOR Publishing. ISBN: 978-620-0-06997-9.
  2. Fegla GI, El-Mazaty MAA. Distribution of certain viruses affecting cucurbits in Egypt and susceptibility of cucurbit cultivars to the most prevalent one. Alex J Agric Res. 1981; 1: 247-258.
  3. Abd El-Aziz MH. Detection of certain plant viruses. M.Sc. Thesis. Fac. Of Agric. (Saba-Basha) Alex Univ Egypt. 2000; 118.
  4. Fegla GI, El-Samra IA, Younes HA, Abd El-Aziz MH. Plain and Filter papers as solid carriers for detection of three plant viruses by dot and tissue blot immunoassays. Adv Agric Res. 2001b; 6: 755-761.
  5. Naidu RA, Hughes JDA. Methods for the detection of plant viral diseases in plant virology in sub-Saharan Africa, Proceedings of plant virology, IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria. Eds. Hughes, JDA Odu B. 2003; 233-260.
  6. Abd El-Aziz MH, Younes HA. Detection of Cucumber mosaic cucumovirus in infected cowpea plants (Vigna unguiculata L.) from northern Egypt. Novel Research in Microbiology J. 2019; 3: 326-340.
  7. Kohler G, Milsten C. Continuous culture of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity. Nature. 1975; 256: 495-497.
  8. Clark MF, Adams AN. Characteristics of the Microplate Method of Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for the Detection of Plant Viruses. J gen Virol. I977; 34: 475-483. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/323416
  9. Lawson RH. Controlling virus diseases in major international flower and bulb crops. Plant Dis. 1981; 65: 780-786.
  10. Koenig R. ELISA in the study of homologous and heterologous reaction of plant viruses. J Gen Virol. 1978; 40: 309-318.
  11. Lin NS, Hsu YH, Hsu HT. Immunological detection of plant viruses and mycoplasmalike organism by direct tissue blotting on nitrocellulose membranes. Phytopathology. 1990; 80: 824-828.
  12. Makkouk KM, Kumari SG. Detection of ten viruses by the tissue-blot immunoassay (TBIA). Arab J Plant Protection. 1996; 14: 3-9.
  13. Hamza KA, Abd El-Aziz MH, Behiry SI, Younes HA. Isolation and purification of potato virus y isolate infecting potato (Solanum tuberosum l.) in al-nubaria region. Middle East J Agri Res. 2018; 7: 1201-1207.
  14. Younes HA, Aseel DG, Abd El-Aziz MH. Identification and purification of cowpea mosaic comovirus isolated from infected cowpea (vigna unguiculata l.) In northern Egypt. Int J Agri Environ Res (IJAER). 2018; 4: 206-212.
  15. Pesic Z, Hiruki C. Comparison of ELISA and dot hyperidization for detection of alfalfa mosaic virus in alfalfa pollen. Can J Plant Pathol. 1988; 10: 116-122.
  16. Castello JD, Hibben CR, Jacobi V. Isolation of tomato mosaic virus from lilac. Plant Dis. 1992; 76: 696-699.
  17. Lommel SA, Mc Cain AH, Morris TJ. Evaluation of indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of plant viruses. Phytopathology. 1982; 72:1018-1022.
  18. Voller A, Bidwell DE, Bartlett A. The enzyme-immunosorbent assay. Flowline press. Guernesy, UK. 1977; 43.
  19. Gillaspie AG. Hopkins MS. Spread of peanut stripe virus from peanut to soybean and yield effect on soybean. Plant Dis. 1991; 75: 1157-1159.
  20. Hammond J, Chastagner GA. Field transmission of tulip breaking virus and serologically related potyviruses in tulip. Plant Dis. 1989; 73: 331-336.
  21. Fegla GI, El-Samra IA, Younes HA, Abd El-Aziz MH. Comparative studies for detection of Tomato Mosaic Tobamovirus (ToMV), Cucumber Mosaic Cucumovirus (CMV) and Potato Y Potyviruses (PVY). Adv Agric Res. 2001; 6: 239-254.
  22. Bar-Joseph M, Moscovitz M, Sharafi Y. Reuse of coated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay plates. Phytopathology. 1979; 69: 424-426.
  23. Abd El-Aziz MH, Behiry SI, Younes HA, Hamza KA. The relationship and relativity between three isolates of Potato virus Y Potyvirus infecting potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) at Alexandria and El-Beheira governorates in northern Egypt. Novel Research in Microbiol J. 2019; 3: 440-452.
  24. Hawkes R, Niday E, Gordon J. A dot-immunobinding assay for monoclonal and other antibodies. Anal Biochemical. 1982; 119: 142-147. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7072935
  25. Powell CA. Detection of three plant viruses by dot - immunobinding assay. Phytopathology. 1987; 77: 306-309.
  26. Abd El-Aziz MH. Studies on some viruses infecting cowpea plants. NOOR Publishing. 978-620-0-06651-0.
  27. Fegla GI, El-Samra IA, Younes HA, Abd El-Aziz MH. Optimization of dot immunobinding assay (DIA) for detection of tomato mosaic virus (ToMV). J Advances in Agric Res. 2000; 5: 1495-1506.
  28. Zheng GY, Kositratant WC, Gumpf DJ. Detection of plant viruses using Dot - immunobinding assay. Chinese J Virol. 1988; 4: 150-156.
  29. Berger PH, Thornbury DW, Pirone TP. Detection of pictogram quantities of potyviruses using a dot immunobinding assay. J Virological Methods. 1985; 12:31-39. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3935655
  30. Al Khalaf M, Kumari SG, Haj Kassem AA, Makkouk KM, Al Chaabi S. Use of the Two Faces of Nitrocellulose Membrane in Tissue Blot Immunoassay for the Detection of Bean yellow mosaic virus and the Possibility of its Mechanically Transmitted from the Printed Membrane to the Host Plant. Arab J Plant Protection. 2009; 27: 91-94.
  31. Makkouk KM, Kumari SG. Low cost paper can be used in tissue blot immunoassay for detection of cereal and legume viruses. Phytopathologia Mediterranea. 2002; 41: 275-278.
  32. Hsu HT, Lawson RH. Direct tissue blotting for detection of tomato spotted wilt virus in Impatiens. Plant Disease. 1991; 75: 292-295.
  33. Lina Katul V, Naiss HJ, Makkouk KM, Lesemann DE, Casper R. Characterization and serology of virus-like particles associated with faba bean necrotic yellows. Ann Appl Biol. 1993; 123: 629-647.
  34. Sherwood JL. Comparison of a filter paper immunobinding assay, western blotting and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of wheat streak mosaic virus. J Phytopathol. 1987; 118: 68-75.
  35. Makkouk KM, Hsu HT, Kumari SG. Detection of three plant viruses by Dot-Blot and Tissue-Blot immunoassays using chemiluminescent and chromogenic substrates. J Phytopathol. 1993; 139: 97-102.
  36. Heide M, Lang L. Detection of Potato leaf roll virus and potato viruses M, S, X and Y by dot immunobinding on plain paper. Potato Research. 1988; 31: 367-373.
  37. Lange L, Jomantor A, Heide M. Testing seeds for viruses by dot immunobinding (DIB) directly on plain paper. Tidsskrift-for-Planteavl. 1989; 93: 93-96.
  38. Banttari EE, Goodwin PH. Detection of potato virus S, X, and Y by enzyme-linked Immunosorbent assay on nitrocellulose membranes (Dot-ELISA). Plant Dis. 1985; 69: 202-205.
  39. Hsu HT, Hibino H, Cabauatan PQ. Development of serological procedures for rapid, sensitive and reliable detection of rice grassy stunt virus. Plant Dis. 1990; 74: 695-698.
  40. Zagula KR, Barbara DJ, Fulbright DW, Lister RM. Evaluation of three ELISA methods as alternatives to ISEM for detection of the wheat spindle streak mosaic virus. Plant Dis. 1990; 74: 974-978.
  41. Klein RE, Wyatt SD, Kaiser WJ, Mink GI. Comparative immunoassays of bean common mosaic virus in individual bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) seed and bulked bean seed samples. Plant Dis. 1992; 76: 57-69.
  42. Lockhart BEL, Maataoui MEL, Carroll TW, Lennon AM, Zaske SK. Identification of Barley yellow striate mosaic virus in Morocco and its field detection by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. Plant Disease 1986; 70: 1113-1117.
  43. Frosheiser FI. Alfalfa Mosaic Virus Transmission to Seed Through Alfalfa Gametes and Longevity in Alfalfa Seed. Phytopathology. 1974; 64: 102-105.
  44. Hemmati K, Mclean DL. Gamete-seed transmission of alfalfa mosaic virus and its effect on seed germination and yield in alfalfa plants. Phytopathology. 1977; 67: 576-579.
  45. Bailiss KW, Offei SK. Alfalfa mosaic virus in Lucerne seed during seed maturation and storage, and in seedlings. Plant Pathology. 1990; 39: 539-547.
  46. Fegla GI, Fath-Allah MM, Younes HA. Alfalfa mosaic alfamovirus in alfalfa floral parts, pods and seeds at different stages of development. J Agric Sci Mansoura Univ. 2004; 29: 4931-4939.
  47. Fegla GI, Younes HA. Isolation of alfalfa mosaic virus from pepper in Alexandria Governorate. Adv Agric Res. 1999; 4: 827-836.
  48. Fegla GI, El-Samra IA, Noaman KA, Younes HA. Host range, transmission and serology of an isolate of tomato yellow leaf curl virus from tomato of plastic houses in northern Egypt. Proceeding of the first Scientific Con of Agric Sc Fac of Agric Assiut. 1997; 1: 549-568.
  49. Fegla GI, Fath-Allah MM, Ali MH. Detection, identification and purification of Cowpea mosaic virus Comovirus isolated from naturally infected fooder cowpea plants (Vigna unguiculata) in Egypt. Egyptian J Applied Sci. 2006; 21: 41-55.


Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 1

Figure 3

Similar Articles

Recently Viewed

Read More

Most Viewed

Read More